#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID TRIAL#
#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID PROFESSIONAL#
#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID TV#
#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID FREE#

Some will say that the free college education is reward enough. But why shouldn’t these athletes be allowed to profit off their own skills and celebrity? If someone wants to pay them to make an appearance somewhere, sign autographs or even appear in a commercial, what is wrong with that? Now, I don’t believe these schools should pay their athletes it creates too many logistical problems to list. (Keep in mind, almost all of these colleges and universities are considered “non-profits” despite this massive amount of income.)

#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID TV#

The schools and the conferences these students play for are making big bucks from TV deals, radio deals and other endorsements. Since then I’ve shifted my position from “They get a scholarship, room and board – and that is plenty” to “They should be allowed to earn their own endorsement money, but should not get paid by the schools.” College sports is a huge money-making enterprise. The debate over whether college athletes should be paid has raged among my friends since we met in 2004. The players have become employees of the universities and conferences as much as students - employees with no compensation, which not only violates common decency but perhaps even the law.Ī reader considers many facets of the question: Yet, no player can benefit from that work. The best football and basketball players in the Big Ten have produced to the degree that a television network has become the model for every conference in America, a network worth at least tens of millions of dollars to the member institutions. The best college athletes in the two revenue-producing sports have always been worth much more than tuition, room, board and books. If the student as athlete can find a way, he/she should be able to endorse products, to have paid-speaking gigs, to sell memorabilia, as Allen Sack, the author and professor at the college of business at the University of New Haven has suggested in recent years.

#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID PROFESSIONAL#

This means they will be managing the same matters as professional athletes and franchises do.Īs a result, in every division, the best student-athletes would receive more representation, and their attention would divert from the joy of the game to get the best contract.Below are the posts that comprise our ongoing discussion on how (or if) college athletes should be compensated for their play.

Mandating the pay would convert it into a legal employment contract and provide athletes an opportunity to unionize. Mandating the pay would lessen the athletic students outside Division I and II. The remaining institutes are inferior in their athletic performances and don’t enjoy similar scholarship benefits. Only 357 post-secondary institutions are under NCAA Division I. This is because they have to cut their budget for athletes, and other departments would not get enough.

#SHOULD COLLEGE ATHLETES BE PAID TRIAL#

It may become unaffordable for the universitiesĬheck ➤ A trial deposit has been successfully made to your Amazon Credit Builder!Ĭritics say that if paying college athletes becomes a law, it will be impossible for universities to bear with that, and many will drop their athletic departments.

Added to that, receiving grades without doing any study work will make them more reluctant. When they are given enough compensation, they hardly wish to go to their classes. It’s a fact that athlete students don’t attend their classes and study as others do. Thus, most of the student-athletes are financially stable to get through their college years without any debt. In addition to free tuition and room, these students also receive stipends for expenses related to books and other basic needs. Athletes playing for national championships are mainly included in this category.

Many college athletes already receive scholarshipsĭefinitely, not every student-athlete receives a scholarship and other benefits, but many are.Job Description, Salary & Benefits Cons.Compensation for their services can help them manage their educational costs easily. Ultimately, students have to pay their fees through loans. Scholarships pay for the additional expenses of the educational institute, but not every student gets the scholarship. So, compensating student-athletes for their contribution in generating revenue would be their rightful share. Fans of athletes would literally buy any product with the team or player’s logo.Īpart from that, coaches also get extra payment to encourage students to wear the products in unison. The revenue directly depends on the students’ influence and fame. Brands pay the athletic department of educational institutions up to $100 million a year. College athletes are responsible for bringing a lot of revenue to educational institutions and the NCAA.

Should college athletes be paid